U.S. Supreme Court,
Immigration,
Criminal
Oct. 3, 2017
As likely deciding vote, Gorsuch questions government lawyer in deportation case
The U.S. Supreme Court reheard oral arguments Monday in a case that will determine whether language interpreted by immigration judges surrounding certain felonies is unconstitutionally vague.
The U.S. Supreme Court reheard oral arguments Monday in a case that will determine whether language interpreted by immigration judges surrounding certain felonies is unconstitutionally vague.
The court heard the case last year with only eight justices. Lawyers familiar with the case said they expected a 5-to-4 vote against the respondent with Trump-appointed Justice Neil Gorsuch on the bench, but that if the statue surrounding aggrav...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In