Oct. 18, 2017
Plaintiffs present First Amendment challenge to arbitration before 9th Circuit
Judicial interpretation of the 1925 Federal Arbitration Act violates the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, an attorney representing a class of consumers suing AT&T Mobility LLC argued before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Judicial interpretation of the 1925 Federal Arbitration Act violates the First Amendment, an attorney representing a proposed class of consumers suing AT&T Mobility LLC argued before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday.
Alexander H. Schmidt, who represents the plaintiffs, said that a string of U.S. Supreme Court decisions upholding employee and consumer arbitration agreements which preclude plaintiffs from pursuing t...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In