SACRAMENTO — A 3rd District Court of Appeal panel has ruled that a lower court must use narrow and specific criteria in demanding a parolee provide warrantless access to electronic devices.
The 64-page opinion, published Wednesday, illustrates the difficulty courts have had in applying traditional search and seizure rules to the digital world. People v. Valdivia, 2017 DJDAR 10643.
The court’s deci...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




