Justice Ming W. Chin
The state Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday on the question of whether Proposition 57 applies to juvenile defendants whose cases were in progress when voters passed the ballot measure.
The original case arose when prosecutors direct-filed a criminal complaint against a minor in adult court in March 2016. Voters passed Proposition 57 eight months later, eliminating direct filing.
But the ball...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



