For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation

Dec. 12, 2017

9th Circuit reaffirms consumer arbitration pact enforceability

In a published ruling for AT&T Mobility LLC and against a putative class of cellphone owners, the court harkened back to Concepcion.

9th Circuit reaffirms consumer arbitration pact enforceability
PINCUS

An appellate panel on Monday shot down a different plaintiffs’ legal theory to make a familiar conclusion: AT&T’s arbitration contracts with its customers are enforceable.

In a published ruling for AT&T Mobility LLC and against a putative class of cellphone owners, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals opinion harkened back to the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2011 decision, AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011).

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up

Related Content

Civil Procedure

Roberts v. AT&T Mobility LLC

Order compelling arbitration affirmed over plaintiffs’ opposition on constitutional grounds where plaintiffs fail to show that defendant’s action is attributable to state.



By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.