This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal,
California Supreme Court

Feb. 2, 2018

State high court affirms retroactive ban on direct filing of juvenile cases in adult court

The court affirmed unanimously that Proposition 57, could be applied retroactively to cases in progress when the initiative was passed.

State high court affirms retroactive ban on direct filing of juvenile cases in adult court
California Supreme Court Justice Ming Chin

The state Supreme Court affirmed unanimously Thursday that Proposition 57, which eliminated direct filing of juvenile delinquency cases in adult court, could be applied retroactively to cases in progress when the initiative passed.

Central to the court's reasoning was its previous ruling in In re: Estrada (1965) 63 Cal.2d 740, which held that a statute that reduced the punishment for a crime applied retroactively to any case...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up