SAN DIEGO -- One issue that emerged in the legal challenges to the U.S. government's plans to replace fencing with a possible wall along California's southern border is whether there is a high amount of illegal entry in the planned project areas.
In seeking to halt the projects, a lawyer for two of the plaintiffs argued Friday in U.S. District Court that the locations where the barriers are planned in San Diego and Calexico are not ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



