Civil Litigation,
Environmental & Energy
Mar. 14, 2018
OC judge says CEQA case is unique
Judge Kim G. Dunning concluded the CEQA dispute before her is unique from all other cited case law because it involves a developer using an environmental document for an overturned project instead of a previously approved project.
SANTA ANA -- A judge halted a city-approved development next to a 19th century jurist's historic San Juan Capistrano home, citing violations of the California Environmental Quality Act that she said involve an unusual circumstance.
While attorneys argued the relevance of a 1st District Court of Appeal decision, Superior Court Judge Kim G. Dunning concluded the CEQA dispute before her is unique from that case and all other cited case...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In