Judges and Judiciary,
California Supreme Court
Apr. 12, 2018
Observers weigh in on effects of chief justice’s proposed rule change
Some observers were concerned about increased litigation, particularly if allegations are made public that turn out to be meritless.
"In 2018, we need to rebalance the protections within the rule to ensure that they do not undermine public trust and confidence in the judicial branch," says Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye.
State judicial officers would be publicly named if they enter into agreements to resolve sexual harassment and discrimination claims, according to a rule change proposed this week by Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye.
But some observers are concerned about increased litigation, particularly if allegations are made public that turn out to be meritless.
"In 2018, we need to rebalance the protecti...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
