Civil Litigation,
Labor/Employment,
California Supreme Court
May 2, 2018
State high court hears argument over off-the-clock minutes
Attorneys for Starbucks and a former manager argued before the state Supreme Court over California and federal wage law.
Stanley D. Saltzman of Marlin & Saltzman LLP, left, argued for the plaintiff, and Rex S. Heinke of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP represented the defendant, Starbucks, in a dispute over off-the-clock work minutes.
Attorneys for Starbucks Corp. and a former manager argued before the state Supreme Court on Tuesday over whether California wage law should import a federal doctrine that sets a minimum for compensable off-the-clock minutes.
The plaintiff, a former Starbucks manager, claims he regularly spent four to 10 minutes at the end of shifts over his 17-month employment closing down the shop after he clocked out. His attorneys have argued that...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In