Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Elihu Berle rejected an argument by coffee makers fighting a warning label on a chemical in the beverage. But a proposed state regulation may overturn that decision.
A proposed regulation stating coffee does not pose a cancer risk is the rare instance in which a state agency is reining in its own law, according to court observers.
Friday's proposal by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, which implements Proposition 65, appears to be a direct rebuttal of a recent Los Angeles County Superior Court ruling that said coffee companies will be required to use warning labels after fail...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



