This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Judges and Judiciary,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Jun. 26, 2018

Supreme Court declines to hear judicial tweet case

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an unusual procedural case involving judicial tweeting Monday.

Supreme Court declines to hear judicial tweet case
William Shubb

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an unusual procedural case involving a judge allegedly following prosecutors' tweets while hearing their case.

The underlying litigation involves a timber company settling a forest fire liability case from 2007 for $122.5 million. Attorneys representing the timber company, Sierra Pacific Industries Inc., claimed they unearthed wrongdoing by federal prosecutors that should invalidate the settl...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up