U.S. Supreme Court,
Health Care & Hospital Law,
Constitutional Law,
Civil Rights
Jul. 3, 2018
NIFLA v Becerra: folly, fallout and follow-up
The Supreme Court's decision in the case was bad for women's right to choose, but Justice Kennedy's retirement may be worse.
Sanford Jay Rosen
Partner Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld LLP
101 Mission Street, 6th Floor
San Francisco , CA 94105
Phone: (415) 433-6830
Fax: (415) 433-7104
Email: srosen@rbgg.com
Yale Law School; New Haven CT
Devin W. Mauney
Associate California Dept. of Justice
Phone: (202) 868-0868
Email: Devin.Mauney@doj.ca.gov
Harvard Univ Law School; Cambridge MA
OCTOBER 2017 TERM
In a week marked by Justice Anthony Kennedy's retirement and the U.S. Supreme Court's approval of the travel ban, the court's sweeping and somewhat puzzling NIFLA v. Becerra (2018 DJDAR 6224, June 26, 2018) decision was just one among many troubling moments.
In NIFLA, the court addressed First Amendment challenges to California's 2015 ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In