Judges and Judiciary,
California Courts of Appeal,
Appellate Practice
Jul. 9, 2018
Appellate court affirms dismissal of judge who failed to disclose law practice
The unanimous opinion Friday from the 3rd District Court of Appeal rejected Richard P. Fisher’s argument that, because he was never informed administrative judges aren’t allowed to work for law firms specializing in administrative matters, he should be reinstated.
An administrative law judge was rightfully fired from the State Personnel Board for failing to disclose his employment at a law firm that had a case before the board, a court of appeal has ruled.
The unanimous opinion Friday from the 3rd District Court of Appeal rejected Richard P. Fisher's argument that, because he was never informed administrative judges aren't allowed to work for law firms specializing in administrative matters, ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In