This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice,
Judges and Judiciary

Jul. 11, 2018

Judicial Council’s disclosures remain murky

The Judicial Council's goal when it revised California Rules of Court 10.500 concerning the disclosure of judicial administrative records was to provide increased transparency into how state courts spend taxpayer funds to resolve claims of harassment and discrimination.

The Judicial Council's goal when it revised California Rules of Court, Rule 10.500 concerning the disclosure of judicial administrative records was to provide increased transparency into how state courts spend taxpayer funds to resolve claims of harassment and discrimination.

But the responsive records made possible by the amendment provided little insight into the context in which the judges named in the records were alleged to hav...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up