Labor/Employment,
Government,
California Supreme Court
Aug. 3, 2018
State Supreme Court: San Diego pension cut illegally placed on ballot
The state Supreme Court ruled San Diego’s pension cuts were illegally placed on a 2012 ballot because city leaders did not negotiate with unions before putting forward the initiative, but the measure itself was not ruled invalid.
The state Supreme Court ruled Thursday San Diego's pension cuts were illegally placed on a 2012 ballot for approval by voters because city leaders did not negotiate with unions before putting forward the initiative.
The ruling overturned a 4th District Court of Appeal decision that said then-San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders was not required to meet and confer with labor leaders before advocating the Proposition B pension measure.
...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Administrative Agencies
Boling v. Public Employment Relations Board
Meyers-Milias-Brown Act requires mayor to 'meet and confer' with municipal employees during process by which mayor sought to eliminate new employee pensions via voter initiative.