Government,
Civil Rights
Aug. 10, 2018
Defense uses case law against witness in voter rights trial
The defense got its turn in a voting rights trial Thursday to cross-examine a plaintiff’s witness, questioning the credentials and legal support of the social sciences historian who had said Santa Monica’s at-large election system was installed with discriminatory intent in 1946, which lead to 72 years of racially polarized voting.
LOS ANGELES -- Citing case law, the defense got its turn in a voting rights trial Thursday to cross-examine a plaintiff's witness, questioning the credentials and legal support of the social sciences historian who had said Santa Monica's at-large election system was installed with discriminatory intent in 1946, which lead to 72 years of racially polarized voting.
The historian, Morgan Kousser, has emerged as one of the plaintiff's k...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In