Labor/Employment,
California Supreme Court
Aug. 14, 2018
Starbucks asks state high court to revisit de minimis time
Starbucks attorneys asked the court to look at minimum paid off-clock minutes where the work is rare or irregular.
Starbucks attorneys have asked that the state Supreme Court allow for minimum paid off-clock minutes where the work is rare or irregular, restructuring a decision where the court ruled there is no minimum for regular work.
On July 27, the court decided unanimously in Troester et al. v. Starbucks Corporation et al., 2018 DJDAR 7361, that the so-called federal 'de minimis' rule, which sets a minimum for compensable off-clock ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In