Civil Litigation,
Labor/Employment
Aug. 17, 2018
Lawsuit over providing seating to cashiers heads to trial
The question of whether employers are required to provide seating to a class of cashiers heads to trial for the first time on Monday since the state Supreme Court opined on the issue two years ago.
The question of whether employers are required to provide seating to a class of cashiers heads to trial for the first time Monday since the state Supreme Court opined on the issue two years ago.
In April 2016, the state high court issued a unanimous opinion in Kilby v. CVS Pharmacy Inc., 2016 DJDAR 3230, when asked to interpret a law on suitable seating after years of litigation involving retailers and banks statewide. Work...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Employment Law
Kilby v. CVS Pharmacy Inc.
California Supreme Court clarifies when employers must provide employees a seat, settling Industrial Welfare Commission's seating provisions.
