This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Real Estate/Development,
Civil Litigation,
Environmental & Energy,
California Courts of Appeal

Aug. 27, 2018

4th District court says no to development by ballot initiative

A state appellate court in San Diego unanimously ruled that local initiative agreements may not be used to adopt private development projects, a tactic plaintiffs in the case said was being tried in other parts of the state to evade environmental and other regulations.

Local initiative agreements may not be used to adopt private development projects, a state appellate court ruled, threatening the development of what was expected to be the world's largest logistic center in Riverside County.

In a unanimous ruling Thursday, the 4th District Court of Appeal in San Diego put a halt to a tactic plaintiffs say could have been used across the state to evade environmental and other regulations.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up