Entertainment & Sports,
Antitrust & Trade Reg.
Sep. 25, 2018
Attorneys debate survey on demand for paid athletes in NCAA antitrust case
Survey analysts on both sides defended their methodology studying pay-for-play’s impact on consumer demand Monday in the potentially landscape-altering NCAA antitrust trial where student-athletes are fighting for a larger stake in the multi-billion dollar industry.
OAKLAND — Survey analysts on both sides defended their methodology studying pay-for-play’s impact on consumer demand Monday in the potentially landscape-altering NCAA antitrust trial where student-athletes are fighting for a larger stake in the multi-billion dollar industry.
Plaintiffs’ counsel criticized the defense analyst’s conclusion, saying it selectively included, excluded and phrased certain questions while the defense argue...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In