Law Practice,
Law Office Management,
Labor/Employment,
California Courts of Appeal
Nov. 8, 2018
Gender bias suit could draw scrutiny to firm partnerships
A newly-revived gender bias lawsuit brought by a former Winston & Strawn LLP partner could lead to a closer look at how loosely a law firm is able to legally define a partnership.
A newly-revived gender bias lawsuit brought by a former Winston & Strawn LLP partner could lead to a closer look at how loosely a law firm is able to legally define a partnership.
A 1st District Court of Appeal panel ruled Friday that San Francisco County Superior Court Judge John Stewart erred in forcing patent practitioner and litigator Constance Ramos into arbitration with her former firm. Stewart found Ramos was bound to arb...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Arbitration
Ramos v. Superior Court
Arbitration agreement unconscionable under minimum requirements of 'Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.' because it limited employee's remedies and provided that empl...
Employment Law
Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services Inc.
Employees may be compelled to arbitrate antidiscrimination claims if arbitration vindicates worker's statutory rights by meeting certain requirements.
