This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Securities,
Civil Litigation,
Criminal

Nov. 28, 2018

Attorneys defend proposed judgment in SEC insider trading case

Two briefs address the role of the SEC and the court in determining the public interest in an insider trading case.

Attorneys defend proposed judgment in SEC insider trading case
MARMARO

Attorneys trying to persuade a federal judge to approve a proposed judgment in a civil insider trading case say the settlement levies a substantial fine while ending a lengthy proceeding that has caused the accused ophthalmology executive "enormous and unimaginable" stress.

Two briefs filed Monday differentiate between the Securities Exchange Commission case against James Mazzo and the criminal case by emphasizing restrictions on Ma...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up