MARMARO
Attorneys trying to persuade a federal judge to approve a proposed judgment in a civil insider trading case say the settlement levies a substantial fine while ending a lengthy proceeding that has caused the accused ophthalmology executive "enormous and unimaginable" stress.
Two briefs filed Monday differentiate between the Securities Exchange Commission case against James Mazzo and the criminal case by emphasizing restrictions on Ma...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




