Civil Litigation
Dec. 3, 2018
Plaintiff prevails in case that made new anti-SLAPP law
It was a fairly typical breach of fiduciary duty case in Los Angeles Superior Court that resulted in a $3.5 million jury verdict recently, but only after it made new case law regarding the anti-SLAPP statute used to knock down frivolous lawsuits seeking to chill speech.
It was a fairly typical breach of fiduciary duty case in Los Angeles Superior Court that resulted in a $3.5 million jury verdict recently, but only after it made new case law regarding the anti-SLAPP statute used to knock down frivolous lawsuits seeking to chill speech.
The jury delivered $2.5 million for breach of fiduciary duty and $1 million in punitive damages in late November to Robert Baral, who sued fellow partner David Schni...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In