This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation,
Labor/Employment,
Constitutional Law,
California Supreme Court

Dec. 5, 2018

State law’s elimination of purchasable service time in pensions was unconstitutional, employees to argue

Attorneys for state employees will argue to the California Supreme Court on Wednesday that lawmakers unconstitutionally rolled back a pension provision that allowed workers to purchase service time which would count toward their eventual earnings.

Attorneys for state employees will argue to the California Supreme Court on Wednesday that lawmakers unconstitutionally rolled back a pension provision that allowed workers to purchase service time which would count toward their eventual earnings.

The ability to purchase so-called "airtime" was introduced by the Legislature in 2003 under Government Code Section 20909. It allowed eligible public employees to buy up to five years of c...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up