Civil Litigation,
Law Practice,
Ethics/Professional Responsibility
Jan. 10, 2019
Uber lawyers get extra time to seek disqualification of opposing counsel in antitrust case
Gibson Dunn lawyers, defending Uber Technologies Inc. in an antitrust suit, claim Quinn Emanuel should be disqualified due to its alleged prior representation of the company.
In their first big move after being brought on to defend Uber Technologies Inc. in an antitrust suit, a team of attorneys at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, led by Theodore Boutrous Jr., argued opposing counsel at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP should be disqualified for the firm's prior work with the ridesharing company.
"Good cause exists for granting Uber's motion," Boutrous wrote. "Quinn Emanuel, during its long ten...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
