Civil Litigation,
California Supreme Court
Feb. 7, 2019
State high court mulls a challenge to anti-SLAPP law
Concerned with a slippery slope in anti-SLAPP law, several members of the state Supreme Court expressed interest Wednesday in better defining what terms like “public interest” and “public figure” mean in a legal context.
Concerned with a slippery slope in anti-SLAPP law, several members of the state Supreme Court expressed interest Wednesday in better defining what terms like "public interest" and "public figure" mean in a legal context.
The discussion came as part of argument in an appeal by FilmOn.com, an internet media company that claims the statue had been repeatedly misapplied in a case against authentication service provider DoubleVerify Inc....
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Anti-SLAPP
FilmOn.com v. DoubleVerify Inc.
Anti-SLAPP motion properly granted in favor of provider of advertising authentication services in suit challenging provider’s negative classification of plaintiff’s websites.
