Civil Litigation
Feb. 22, 2019
Smaller groups in opioid case concerned their interests will be lose out
With the first test case over allegations that drug makers and distributors are responsible for the nationwide opioid epidemic approaching in May, some plaintiffs that are a part of the consolidated litigation in Ohio are concerned their interests are not being properly represented by the lead attorneys, according to legal observers.
With the first test case over allegations that drug makers and distributors are responsible for the nationwide opioid epidemic approaching in May, some plaintiffs that are a part of the consolidated litigation in Ohio are concerned their interests are not being properly represented by the lead attorneys, according to legal observers.
San Mateo County, which has suffered "devastating social and economic consequences," according to ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation
Bifurcation debate halts Orange County opioids trial
By Meghann Cuniff
Civil Litigation
Defendants seek sanctions in state opioid litigation
By Meghann Cuniff
Civil Litigation
Opioid cases in California should be coordinated, lawyer says
By Meghann Cuniff
Civil Litigation, Government
San Francisco joins suit against drugmakers over opioid epidemic
By Winston Cho
Criminal, California Courts of Appeal
Opioid prescriber loses appeal of murder conviction
By Paula Lehman-Ewing
