This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation

Feb. 25, 2019

Judge rules claims were not uniform in rare class action trial

In one of the few class actions to go to trial over the past few years, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has found Public Storage did not mislead customers into believing they were required to buy insurance through the company.

Judge rules claims were not uniform in rare class action trial
Carolyn Kuhl

In one of the few class actions to go to trial over the past few years, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has found Public Storage did not mislead customers into believing they were required to buy insurance through the company.

The class action was the fifth to go to trial in California in the past three years, consisting of 70,000 customers seeking $150 million. Downtown Los Angeles complex court Judge $95

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up