Labor/Employment,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Feb. 27, 2019
9th Circuit says Janus doesn’t make exclusive bargaining unconstitutional.
Two former union members alleged that the union’s status as their exclusive bargainer violates their First Amendment rights.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the argument that a U.S. Supreme Court decision outlawing mandatory union fees charged to nonmembers also renders exclusive bargaining provisions unconstitutional.
Last year in Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31, 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018), the Supreme Court...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Constitutional Law
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31
'Abood,' overturned; public-sector agency-shop arrangement contravenes First Amendment.
Constitutional Law
Miller v. Inslee
'Janus' does not render state-mandated exclusive bargaining arrangement a First Amendment free association violation.
