1st District Court of Appeal Judge James M. Humes supports a proposal to allow panels to issue draft opinions before oral argument, a change he described as an "incremental measure."
Tucked inconspicuously near the end of a lengthy release Wednesday by the 1st District Court of Appeal that proposes, mostly, minor changes to the court's local rules is what Division Two Presiding Justice Anthony Kline describes as a "major transformation" that culminates decades of debate on an uncommon appellate procedure: the issuance of draft opinions in advance of oral argument.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy
here.




