Entertainment & Sports,
Antitrust & Trade Reg.
Mar. 15, 2019
NCAA ruling unlikely the watershed advocates hoped
The federal judge overseeing student-athletes’ most recent bid for a pay-for-play compensation model took a sympathetic view of their case but was limited to findings by higher courts more supportive of the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s position on amateurism, several legal observers said.
SAN FRANCISCO -- The federal judge overseeing student-athletes' most recent bid for a pay-for-play compensation model took a sympathetic view of their case but was limited to findings by higher courts more supportive of the National Collegiate Athletic Association's position on amateurism, several legal observers said.
U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken of Oakland was...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Entertainment & Sports, Antitrust & Trade Reg.
NCAA appeals, while plaintiffs seek $45 million in attorney fees
By Carter Stoddard
Civil Litigation, Entertainment & Sports
Judge denies NCAA’s bid for a stay in athlete-compensation suit
By Gina Kim
