This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Civil Litigation,
Intellectual Property

Nov. 5, 2019

Will the U.S. Supreme Court curtail the USPTO’s fee grab?

Given the statutory language, the importance of the so-called “American Rule” to the issue of fee shifting, and the public policy benefits of preventing government overreach, the Supreme Court is likely to conclude that the USPTO’s attempt to recover attorney fees is impermissible.

Bobby Ghajar

Partner
Cooley LLP

Email: bghajar@cooley.com

Bobby is a partner in the firm's Trademark, Copyright, and False Advertising Practice Group. He has handled dozens of high-stakes litigation and appellate matters for some of the top brand owners in the world. For several years, World Trademark Review has listed him as one of only a few lawyers in California with a "Gold" ranking for trademark enforcement and litigation; the Daily Journal has recognized him as one of the top IP litigators in California; and he is ranked by Legal 500 as a leading trademark litigator.

Marcus Peterson

Associate
Cooley LLP

Email: mpeterson@cooley.com

Marcus an associate in the firm's Trademark, Copyright, and False Advertising Practice Group. He offers clients a full-range trademark practice, including counseling, clearance, prosecution, enforcement, and litigation. He also litigates in state and federal court in disputes regarding trademarks, copyrights, right of publicity, false advertising, Stored Communications Act, breach of contract, and wrongful termination; with successful resolution at the pleading stage, on summary judgment, and at trial.

In the coming months, the United States Supreme Court will decide whether the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is entitled to collect attorney fees when an applicant challenges the USPTO's denial of a patent by initiating litigation in a district court. Under the current practice, the USPTO will seek compensation for its fees incurred in defending its decision in the district court under a statute allowing it to recover "all expenses of the proceedings" -- even when i...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up