Labor/Employment
Dec. 5, 2019
Revisiting ‘kangaroo court’ workplace due process
Until courts and legislators recognize that anything short of a jury trial cannot constitute meaningful due process, incentives will continue to exist for employers to attempt to “whitewash” wrongful conduct through judicially sanctioned “kangaroo court” procedures.
William M. Crosby
Law Office of William M. CrosbyLabor & Employment
13522 Newport Ave Ste 201
Tustin , CA 92780
Phone: (714) 544-2493
Fax: (714) 544-2497
Email: wcrosby@williamcrosbylaw.com
Loyola Law School
Appellate courts in recent years have addressed the concept of adequate due process in employment. In Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall Intl., Inc., 17 Cal. 4th 93 (1998), the California Supreme Court held that an adequate investigation, including obtaining the accused's side of the story, constituted sufficient due process to justify a terminatio...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In