This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice,
Civil Litigation,
Appellate Practice

Dec. 9, 2019

How to count to 30

When an appellate justice writes a concurrence just to point out a trap for unwary practitioners, it merits some consideration. The “trap” is one of counting the days that are allowed after an award in a mandatory fee arbitration before one’s right to request a trial de novo evaporates.

Gerald G. Knapton

Senior Partner
Ropers Majeski PC

Email: gerald.knapton@ropers.com

When an appellate justice writes a concurrence just to point out a trap for unwary practitioners, it merits some consideration. The "trap" is one of counting the days that are allowed after an award in a mandatory fee arbitration before one's right to request a trial de novo evaporates. And because it concerns arbitration of legal fees, the "mother's milk" of the practice of our profession as well as our reputation, it is very important to get this right.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up