This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Dec. 18, 2019

California employers: Dos and don’ts of dress codes in 2020

While Senate Bill 188 specifically contemplated hair textures and hair styles associated with African-Americans, employers should be mindful that the amendments apply to “traits historically associated with race,” with hair textures and protective hair styles being the enumerated examples. As such, the new law has a broad impact.

Darcey M. Groden

Associate
Fisher Phillips LLP

Email: dgroden@fisherphillips.com

Earlier this year, the California Legislature passed Senate Bill 188, which expanded the definition of race under the Fair Employment and Housing Act to include hair textures and hair styles historically associated with that race. While SB 188 specifically contemplated hair textures and hair styles associated with African-Americans, employers should be mindful that the amendments apply to "traits historically associated with race," with hair textures and protective ha...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up