This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Probate

Feb. 6, 2020

Much ado about standing

The California Supreme Court just reopened the probate court to disinherited trust beneficiaries.

Kevin Rodriguez

Partner
Wendel Rosen LLP

Email: krodriguez@wendel.com

Kevin is chair of the firm's Trust & Estates Litigation Practice Group.

Mathew John

Litigation Attorney
Wendel Rosen LLP

Email: mjohn@wendel.com

Mathew is a litigation attorney in the firm's Trust & Estate Litigation Practice Group.

In a generally welcomed decision, the California Supreme Court on Jan. 24 held in Barefoot v. Jennings, 2020 DJDAR 490, that previously named trust beneficiaries who were disinherited under a subsequent amendment do in fact have standing in probate court to challenge that amendment on the basis of incompetence, undue influence or fraud. While such actions in probate c...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up