U.S. Supreme Court,
Government,
Constitutional Law
Mar. 16, 2020
Arguments shed light on justices’ thinking in Seila v. CFPB
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in one of the most highly anticipated separation-of-powers cases in years about whether the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau structure is unconstitutional.
Blaine H. Evanson
Partner
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Appellate and Constitutional Law and Intellectual Property
3161 Michelson Drive
Irvine , California 92612-4412
Phone: (949) 451-3805
Email: bevanson@gibsondunn.com
Columbia Univ Law School
Blaine is based in the firm's Orange County office, where he practices in the Appellate and Constitutional Law group.
Lochlan F. Shelfer
Senior Associate
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Lochlan is a senior associate in the firm's Washington, D.C. office practicing in the firm's Appellate and Constitutional Law practice group.
Jeremy M. Christiansen
Senior Associate
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Jeremy is a senior associate in the firm's Washington, D.C. office practicing in the firm's Appellate and Constitutional Law practice group.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in one of the most highly anticipated separation-of-powers cases in years: Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The CFPB is an independent agency that exercises substantial executive authority but is headed by a single director whom the president may not remove except for cause. The question presented in Seila Law is whether that structure is u...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In