This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice,
Civil Litigation

Apr. 24, 2020

A modest proposal for video trials

Sometimes it takes a crisis to reimagine what might be.

Sidney Kanazawa

Mediator/Arbitrator, Attorney
ARC (Alternative Resolution Centers)

Email: skanazawa@arc4adr.com

USC Gould School of Law

Sometimes it takes a crisis to reimagine what might be.

In 1971, Judge James L. McCrystal of Ohio conducted the first video trial to move the backlog of cases in his court. All of the witnesses were recorded on video. Objections were noted on the video recording. The judge reviewed the objections and ruled on their admissibility. The recordings were then edited to remove objectionable questions, answers, and argument, and the record...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up