This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Criminal,
Constitutional Law

Jul. 9, 2020

Who watches the watchers?

In all criminal cases, the accused is presumed innocent. This means that a jury must not presume that person accused of violating the law did so. But just a few months ago, the U.S. Supreme Courtruled that police officers may reasonably infer that a person is violating the law and, on that basis, pull him over.

2nd Appellate District, Division 5

Brian M. Hoffstadt

Presiding Justice
California Court of Appeal

UCLA School of Law, 1995

In all criminal cases, the accused is presumed innocent. Morrisette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 275 (1952). This means that a jury must not presume that person accused of violating the law did so. But just a few months ago, the U.S. Supreme Court in Kansas v. Glover, 140 S. Ct. 1183 (2020) ruled that police officers may reasonably infer tha...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up