U.S. Supreme Court,
Government,
Constitutional Law
Jul. 13, 2020
Tea leaves and the CFPB
A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision is notable for what it does, but also for what it doesn't do. It held that the fact that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is led by a single director removable only for inefficiency, neglect or malfeasance violates separation of powers.
Anne Voigts
Partner
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
The U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 2020 DJDAR 6423, is notable for what it does, but also for what it doesn't do. It held that the fact that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is led by a single director removable only for inefficiency, neglect or malfeasance violates se...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In