Torts/Personal Injury,
Letters
Aug. 3, 2020
Column says 'Reptile Theory' improper but cites successful use of it?
I read with interest Robert Tyson's July 31 column, "The Reptile Theory: Use it." But a question: Mr. Tyson objects that the Reptile Theory is "legally and morally" improper, but then cites one of his own cases in which a woman suffered a catastrophic injury due solely to his client's negligence.
Michael J. Faber
Law Offices of Michael J. FaberEmail: mfaber@faberlaw.net
Northwestern Univ SOL; Chicago IL
I read with interest Robert Tyson's July 31 column, "The Reptile Theory: Use it." But a question: Mr. Tyson objects that the Reptile Theory is "legally and morally" improper, but then cites one of his own cases in which a woman suffered a catastrophic injury due solely to his client's negligence. He claims he used a variant of the Reptile Theory defending the case, and brags, "In the ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In