Civil Litigation,
Antitrust & Trade Reg.
Aug. 21, 2020
The line between anticompetitive behavior and hypercompetitive behavior
Last week, the 9th Circuit handed a big victory to Qualcomm, Inc., reversing the district court’s judgment that Qualcomm unreasonably restrained trade in, and unlawfully monopolized, certain modem chip markets, in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act.
Jason D. Russell
Partner
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Litigation
300 S Grand Ave, Suite 3400
Los Angeles , CA 90071
Phone: (213) 687-5000
Fax: (213) 687-5600
Email: jason.russell@skadden.com
Columbia Univ Law School
Zack Faigen
Counsel
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
On Aug. 11, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals handed a big victory to Qualcomm, Inc., reversing the district court's judgment that Qualcomm unreasonably restrained trade in, and unlawfully monopolized, certain modem chip markets, in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. In reversing the judgment, the 9th Circuit also vacated the lower court's permanent, nationwide injunction prohibiting several of Qualcomm's core business practices. $95
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In