This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice,
Ethics/Professional Responsibility,
Civil Litigation

Sep. 3, 2020

Settle-and-sue malpractice cases: What should the plaintiff have to prove?

You represented your client from the beginning of a dispute to the very end. You obtained a result that, while not an outright victory, was still acceptable to the client. It was signed and sealed. Now, the client has buyer's (or seller's) remorse and believes that you should have advised against the deal -- and sues for malpractice.

Heather L. Rosing

Founding Partner
Rosing Pott & Strohbehn

Legal Malpractice (Specialist), Business Law

501 W Broadway, A380
San Diego , CA 92101

Phone: (619) 990-5566

Email: hrosing@rosinglaw.com

Northwestern Univ School of Law

Heather serves as the chairperson of the Legal Ethics and Law Firm Risk Management Practice Group, as well as the Lawyers and Accountants Practice Group. She is an appointed advisor to the State Bar of California's Rules Revision Commission.

David M. Majchrzak

Partner
Rosing Pott & Strohbehn

Litigation, Legal Ethics

501 W Broadway A380
San Diego , CA 92101-3584

Email: dmajchrak@rosinglaw.com

Thomas Jefferson School of Law

David practices in the areas of legal ethics and litigation of professional liability claims.

Dan Lawton

Partner
Klinedinst PC in San Diego

501 W Broadway #1100
San Diego , CA 92101

Phone: (619) 400-8000

Email: dlawton@klinedinstlaw.com

Georgetown Univ Law Center

The views expressed here are his own.

You represented your client from the beginning of a dispute to the very end. You obtained a result that, while not an outright victory, was still acceptable to the client. It was signed and sealed. Now, the client has buyer's (or seller's) remorse and believes that you should have advised against the deal. The client may be saying that you did not properly assess the case for settlement purposes, or that you did not adequately communicate the pros and cons of the sett...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up