Criminal
Oct. 26, 2020
Review the rules requiring corroboration of accomplice testimony
The objective of this article and accompanying self-study test is to review the rules regarding the requirement that testimony from an accomplice must be corroborated in order to be admissible at trial. Readers will learn about the nature of the rule, who is considered an accomplice, and what qualifies as sufficient corroboration.
Gregory L. Prickett
Judge
Orange County Superior Court
The objective of this article and accompanying self-study test is to review the rules regarding the requirement that testimony from an accomplice must be corroborated in order to be admissible at trial. Readers will learn about the nature of the rule, who is considered an accomplice, and what qualifies as sufficient corroboration.
The Rule
$95
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In