Before the passage of Proposition 22 last week, representative actions alleging Uber and Lyft misclassified drivers were a reliable source of work for plaintiffs' attorneys in California.
The vast numbers of drivers, combined with what plaintiffs' attorneys say were especially egregious violations, made the cases attractive to take on.
But the large number of these cases could also work to these a...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In