This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Nov. 9, 2020

Reverse auctions are part of Uber, Lyft settlements, some plaintiffs claim

The vast numbers of drivers, combined with what plaintiffs' attorneys say were especially egregious violations, made the cases attractive to take on.

Before the passage of Proposition 22 last week, representative actions alleging Uber and Lyft misclassified drivers were a reliable source of work for plaintiffs' attorneys in California.

The vast numbers of drivers, combined with what plaintiffs' attorneys say were especially egregious violations, made the cases attractive to take on.

But the large number of these cases could also work to these a...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up