Civil Litigation
Nov. 10, 2020
No coffee warning labels for now despite appeal, judge rules
“Given this matter is going to be appealed shortly, it would be confusing to the public to have off again, on again warnings to the public,” said the plaintiff’s attorney, Scott P. Brust of the Metzger Law Group. “There is a very real possibility of confusion by the public in having warnings given and then no longer given, then to have the warning reinstated.”
LOS ANGELES -- Coffee sellers do not need to post warning signs in front of stores, a judge ruled Monday, granting a motion to modify a recent judgment in Starbucks' favor that found the chemical acrylamide does not cause cancer.
After a decade-long court battle, Los Angeles County Judge Elihu M. Berle sided with Starbucks and other coffee producers and retailers in ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation
Decade-long coffee labeling case ends with summary judgment for defense
By Blaise Scemama
Law Practice
Law firms join national effort to let employees off to vote
By Kamila Knaudt
Judges and Judiciary, California Supreme Court
State Supreme Court orders LA presiding judge to say why civil cases can’t proceed telephonically
By Justin Kloczko
