Assume two employees work in a bank. One uses the bank's Zoom account to host a virtual family gathering at Christmas; the other uses the same account to sell your personal financial information on the dark-web. Conceivably, the employee who hosted the family gathering could face criminal liability, and the dishonest teller might not. Or so argued the petitioner in Van Buren v. United States, a case recently heard by the U.S. Supreme Court ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In