Law Practice,
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Jan. 15, 2021
Best practices for remote advocacy during the pandemic
The pandemic has caused a rapid turn to technology as many proceedings and functions that would typically be deemed in-person activities have transitioned to being remote.
Daniel B. Garrie
Neutral
JAMS
Cyber Security
Orange County
Cell: (212) 826-5351
Email: daniel@lawandforensics.com
Gail A. Andler
Neutral
JAMS
Email: gandler@jamsadr.com
Gail A. Andler is a retired judge of the Orange County Superior Court. She is a Southern California-based neutral who specializes in business, employment, class actions, and mass torts.
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has significantly changed the legal world. Legal proceedings have traditionally been in-person activities, with counsel, parties, witnesses, and the judge, arbitrator or mediator all physically present. However, the pandemic has caused a rapid turn to technology as many proceedings and functions that would typically be deemed in-person activities have transitioned to being remote. As attorneys, especially litigation attorneys, make the tr...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In