U.S. Supreme Court,
Civil Litigation,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Feb. 10, 2021
Supreme Court to consider Article III standing for class members
In TransUnion, LLC v. Ramirez, the U.S. Supreme Court is poised to address an issue of critical importance to class action practitioners: what do plaintiffs’ counsel have to show to establish the standing of absent class members?
Anna McLean
Partner
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Anna is a partner in the firm's Business Trial Practice Group and is based in its San Francisco office. She is also a leader of the firm's Class Action Defense Team.
Michael A. Lundholm
Associate
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Phone: 415-774-2995
Email: mlundholm@sheppardmullin.com
Michael is an associate in the firm's Business Trial Practice Group and is based in its San Francisco office.
In TransUnion, LLC v. Ramirez, the U.S. Supreme Court is poised to address an issue of critical importance to class action practitioners: what do plaintiffs' counsel have to show to establish the standing of absent class members? The court granted TransUnion's petition for certiorari on the question of "[w]hether either Article III or Rule 23 permits a damages class action where the vast majority of the class suffered no actual injury, let ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In